Skip to main content
AI-Law § AI-Law

Legal // Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

Cookie notice

Provisions on the left, the reason for each beside it. Nothing is stored on your device by these pages, so no permission is sought for storing it. One request does still leave your browser for somebody else's server, and clause 5 names it.

Effective 11 August 2026Version 1.0Nothing storedNo consent dialogue

1The answer, before the detail

1.1

No cookie is placed by this website. Nothing goes into local storage, session storage or IndexedDB. There is no analytics package, no tag manager, no advertising pixel, no session recorder, no heat map, no embedded social widget and no permission dialogue.

Whole answerClauses 2 to 12 exist to show the working, not to qualify this one.

1.2

One request nevertheless leaves your browser for a party other than this company. Your browser asks Google's font service for two families, and in asking discloses your network address to it. That request is the entire external surface of the site, and clause 5 describes it rather than burying it.

Disclosed earlyA notice that saves its one genuine disclosure for the eleventh paragraph is a notice arranged to be skimmed.

Read nothing else

Nothing here identifies you, follows you, or remembers that you came. The only outside party learning anything is a font service, and clause 5.3 explains how to stop even that.

2The subject matter of this notice

2.1

A cookie is a fragment of data a site hands to your browser and asks to have handed back on later visits. It is the oldest device for making a protocol that forgets behave as though it remembers, and it is why a shopping basket survives a page load.

Narrow wordThe word has outgrown the mechanism. A notice discussing only cookies, on a site using the rest, misleads by omission.

2.2

This notice therefore covers the whole family.

  • Local and session storage. Larger stores held by the browser. One persists until cleared; the other ends with the tab.
  • IndexedDB. A structured store in the browser, capable of holding a great deal more.
  • The cache. Copies kept so a second page arrives faster. Cache timing has served as a covert identifier.
  • Pixels and beacons. An image or a script request whose only work is to tell an outside party that a page loaded.
  • Fingerprinting. Assembling a probable identifier out of fonts, screen dimensions, time zone, hardware and behaviour, storing nothing whatever.
  • Server logs. Not on your device, but they hold your address and what you asked for.

Real questionNot whether a site sets a cookie. Whether the site can tell you were here before, and whether it tells anybody else.

3What these pages place on your device

3.1

Nothing. Every page at ailaw.im is a static file. No application runs behind them, and there is no session, no login, no basket, no preference worth remembering and no consent state to record. A cookie here would have no work to do.

CauseThe absence follows from how the site is built rather than from a policy that could be revised on a Tuesday.

3.2 — Each mechanism, and its position on this site
MechanismIn usePosition
Cookies, first partyNoneNo page here issues one, and no response of ours carries a Set-Cookie header.
Cookies, third partyNoneGoogle's font service returns static files and issues no cookie on the font domains.
Local storageNoneThe one script on the site does not touch it.
Session storageNoneLikewise untouched.
IndexedDBNoneLikewise.
Service workerNoneNone is registered. Nothing is held offline and nothing stands between you and the server.
Beacons and pixelsNoneNo tracking image, no measurement endpoint, no telemetry call anywhere in the pages.
FingerprintingNoneNothing samples your fonts, canvas, audio stack or hardware, and nothing derives an identifier from them.
Browser cacheOrdinary cachingStylesheet, script and icon carry a cache lifetime so a second page arrives faster. Standard behaviour, and no identifier of ours.

3.3

Every line of that table can be checked from outside. Open the developer tools, watch the storage and network panels, reload the page. Direct observation beats a paragraph of assurance from the party being assured about.

InvitationMeant literally. Clause 12.2 says what happens if your observation and this table disagree.

4The single script, and its two jobs

4.1

One script runs on this website. It comes from this domain, runs to about a hundred lines, and does two things.

  • It marks the page so the stylesheet may fold the navigation into a button on a narrow screen, and it opens and shuts that menu when the button is pressed.
  • It marks the page a second time so sections may fade in as they are scrolled to, having first confirmed that your browser supports the observer it relies on and that you have not asked for reduced motion.

ReadableThe whole file, comments included, is at /pinpoint.js. Nothing about it needs taking on trust.

4.2

Both behaviours fail open. Should the script not load, or be blocked, or rely on something your browser lacks, every section of every page remains visible and every navigation link remains in the header. Nothing on this site hides behind working JavaScript.

The script issues no request over the network, reads no cookie, writes no storage and sends nothing anywhere.

Failing openA menu that vanishes when a script is blocked is a menu that punishes the cautious reader.

5The typeface request

5.1

Here is the one point at which something leaves your browser for an outside party, so it takes a clause of its own rather than a footnote.

These pages call for Vollkorn and Overpass Mono. Your browser fetches a short stylesheet from fonts.googleapis.com, then the font files themselves from fonts.gstatic.com.

ConsequenceAny request to any server discloses the requester's address to that server. There is no version of this that discloses nothing.

5.2 — What that request discloses, and what it does not
ItemPosition
Network addressDisclosed, necessarily, as with any request to any server.
User agentDisclosed. The browser sends it, and the service picks a font format by it.
Referring pageOrdinarily disclosed, so Google may infer that a browser at your address opened a page on this domain.
CookiesNot issued. Google states that requests for font files return none.
What you read or type hereNot disclosed. There is nothing to type, and a font request carries no page content.
Identifiers from this companyNone. Nothing is attached going out and nothing comes back.

5.3

Serving the fonts from this domain would end the disclosure altogether. It is on the list of things to do, and this notice is corrected on the day it happens. Calling a convenience a considered decision would be the dishonest version of this paragraph.

Until then, three ways to prevent the request. Block the two font domains in a content blocker. Turn off downloadable fonts, where your browser allows it. Or use a browser or profile that blocks third party requests generally. The pages remain entirely usable: text falls back to Georgia and a system monospace, the layout is unchanged, and nothing here detects, discourages or reacts to a blocked font.

No penaltyA site that degrades when you protect yourself has told you what it thinks of the protection.

6Logs, which are not on your device

6.1

Strictly, logs sit outside the subject of a cookie notice, being held on a server rather than on your device. They appear here because they are the only other place a record of your visit exists, and omitting them would leave this page accurate and misleading at once.

A hosting and delivery provider serves the static files, and, like every web server, records the requests. A line ordinarily carries the hour, the address the request came from, the path, the status returned, the user agent and the referring page.

InclusionTechnically out of scope, practically the most important paragraph on the page for a reader who cares about being observed.

6.2

  • The provider holds them, on the provider's own schedule rather than this company's.
  • They are not read as a matter of routine, not exported, not joined to any other data and not made into a profile.
  • They exist so that a provider may run a service, absorb an attack and look into abuse.

A network address can amount to personal information under Australian law where a person is reasonably identifiable from it, whether alone or alongside something else. The privacy policy treats it as personal information for that reason.

Careful word"Can amount to" rather than "is". Identifiability is a question of circumstances, and a policy asserting otherwise is overclaiming in both directions.

7Measurement, and its absence

7.1

Nearly every site of this kind carries a measurement package. This one carries none, and the reasoning is worth putting down.

Measurement answers questions about behaviour in aggregate, and it gets there by watching individuals. On a site with no funnel to tune and no advertising to attribute, the only real gain is curiosity about how many people read a page. Curiosity is not sufficient warrant for loading an outside script into a stranger's browser.

ThresholdThe test is whether the visitor would have consented had anyone asked. For a page count, plainly not.

7.2

A second reason belongs to this company in particular. Its customers are law practices, and a practitioner opening this page may well be turning over a client matter while doing it. Reporting that visit to a measurement vendor would be a poor advertisement for a company asking to be trusted near legal documents.

Should measurement ever be added, it will be first party, cookieless, aggregate, with nothing that follows anybody between sites. This page will describe it before it starts, and the recipient will appear in the table in the privacy policy.

Order againDescribing it first is what distinguishes a commitment from an announcement.

8No dialogue asking permission

8.1

No permission dialogue interrupts this site, and the omission is deliberate.

The dialogue most readers recognise descends from European law, principally the ePrivacy Directive, which requires consent before information is stored on or read from a device unless it is strictly necessary. No Australian counterpart exists. What binds this company is the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the principles in Schedule 1 to it.

Common errorSites in this country routinely deploy the European furniture without the European obligation, and readers learn nothing from it.

8.2

  • APP 3 permits collection only where it is reasonably necessary for a function or activity of the entity, by lawful and fair means. Collecting nothing satisfies that by subtraction rather than by argument.
  • APP 5 requires notice of the matters it lists. This page and the privacy policy are that notice.
  • The Commissioner's guidance treats an identifier held on a device as personal information where a person is reasonably identifiable from it. Storing none avoids the question entirely.

A dialogue seeking leave to do nothing would be theatre. Worse, it trains readers to dismiss consent dialogues unread, which is a small harm the industry has inflicted at enormous scale. Should this site ever store something not strictly necessary, consent will be sought properly, before the storing, with a refusal that leaves the site entirely usable.

Standard appliedConsent before the act, and a refusal that costs the reader nothing. Anything short of that is a formality.

9Controlling storage yourself

9.1

Although these pages store nothing, you may want a firmer setting for everywhere else. Every current browser keeps the controls under its privacy settings, where cookies and site data can be cleared, restricted to the site being visited, or blocked outright. A private window discards storage when it closes. A content blocker gives finer control still, the font domains at clause 5.1 included.

Deliberately generalMenu paths move with each release. A screenshot of last year's settings panel helps nobody.

9.2

Blocking everything from this site costs you nothing. No feature here depends on storage, so nothing degrades and no message appears asking you to reconsider.

TestTurn it all off and compare the page against clause 3.2.

10Signals your browser can send

10.1

Two signals are worth a clause, since a notice ignoring them is usually concealing something.

The older is a header asking sites not to track the person browsing. It never acquired legal force in this country and most sites disregard it. Honouring it here would change nothing, there being no tracking to suspend with the header or without it.

Honest answerClaiming to honour a signal that would alter no behaviour is a claim worth nothing.

10.2

The later signal, Global Privacy Control, operates in some jurisdictions as an effective withdrawal from the selling and sharing of personal information. This company sells nothing and shares nothing for cross context behavioural advertising, so the signal has nothing here to switch off. Were that ever to change, the signal would be honoured and this clause would say by what mechanism.

Cross-referencePrivacy policy, clause 25.2, which answers the same point under Californian law.

11If any of this alters

11.1

An undertaking is worth something only if a departure from it becomes visible.

  • Should this site ever issue a cookie, use storage, add measurement or admit any outside script, this page is amended before the change goes live rather than after it.
  • The effective date and version in the heading move with the amendment, and a note sits above the heading for a minimum of 30 days.
  • Where consent is genuinely required it is sought before anything is stored, and declining leaves the site entirely usable.
  • Any new recipient also appears in the recipients table in the privacy policy, which remains the single authoritative list.

One listTwo lists of recipients drift apart, and the reader has no way of telling which one is stale.

11.2

Superseded versions of this notice are not published as separate pages, but they are kept. Ask what this page said on a given date and that version will be sent to you.

AvailableSame undertaking as the privacy policy at clause 26.1.

12Questions, and complaints

12.1

Questions about anything here go to hello@ailaw.im. Use the subject line Privacy request for a formal answer inside 30 days, or anything sensible if you simply want to ask.

ClocksPrivacy policy, clause 27.2, sets out each subject line and the period attaching to it.

12.2

If this page turns out to be wrong, that is a defect and the company wants to hear about it. Say what you observed and by what means. The page is either corrected, or you are told why the observation shows something other than it appears to. Nobody here will argue with a network trace.

BurdenAn observation from outside beats an assertion from inside. That is the whole reason clause 3.3 invites the check.

12.3

Entity: AI-LAW PTY LTD, ACN 698 421 608, ABN 23 698 421 608, a proprietary company limited by shares in Western Australia.

No postal address is published here. Where a document must be served, ASIC holds the company's registered office against ACN 698 421 608, and service is properly effected at the office that register shows.

A complaint may also go straight to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC), GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001, telephone 1300 363 992, oaic.gov.au, which charges nothing to receive one and needs no agreement from this company.

Not a gateWriting to the company first is a preference and a condition of nothing.